BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//Global Credit Data - ECPv6.15.15//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-WR-CALNAME:Global Credit Data
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://globalcreditdata.org
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for Global Credit Data
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Europe/Paris
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:CEST
DTSTART:20180325T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:CET
DTSTART:20181028T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:CEST
DTSTART:20190331T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:CET
DTSTART:20191027T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:CEST
DTSTART:20200329T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:CET
DTSTART:20201025T010000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Paris:20190715T140000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Paris:20190715T143000
DTSTAMP:20261113T045615
CREATED:20190709T080318Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20210927T233229Z
UID:4896-1563199200-1563201000@globalcreditdata.org
SUMMARY:Special Working Group LGD Reference Model (15/7/2019)
DESCRIPTION:Dear LGD reference model WG members\, \nSince two weeks\, we’ve had discussions with FCG\, Pubudu and the chairs of the WG. \nThe situation is now clarified in that the extension would require a delay of minimum 6 weeks with risks regarding the validity of applying the LC RDS onto this new scope. \nTherefore\, it is asked to vote pro or cons the extension of the scope. \nPlease vote by email by replying to this email to olivier.plaetevoet@globalcreditdata.org or by attending the last special WG this Monday July 15th at 2pm-2:30pm CET / 8am-8:30am EDT / 10pm-10:30pm AEST  . \n  \nDetailed information: \nArguments for the rescoping: \na) The current study is based on the assumption that the Large Corporate segmentation is representative for LGD modelling. Basing on this assumption may lead to inaccurate results. \nb) The study is not relevant for banks that don’t use the Basel FAC segmentation (eg. Canadian banks). \n  \nArguments against the rescoping: \na) An estimated delay of minimum 6 weeks will occur given that we need to rescope from a LC to a total scope. It means Modelling done by mid-September and Documentation done by mid-October. This planning doesn’t take into consideration the definition of a new RDS! Therefore\, FCG estimates there is a strong risk that the conclusion will be incorrect in case the RDS doesn’t fit the larger scope (see points below). \nb) The Large Corporate scope was chosen because we decided to start the WG in a controlled environment (with a validated LC report and RDS). Once the method proves to be validated by satisfying results\, we can direct the study toward a larger scope in a second stage. \nc) The purpose of using a RDS conflicts with extending it to a different scope because it is defined for a specific representativeness purpose : \n“The purpose of creating an RDS is to match as closely as possible the risk conditions of a target portfolio of a single bank.  Therefore\, a single standard RDS could not possibly suit all users.  In this report GCD bases the analytics on a filtered data set which combines elements of representativeness and data quality.” \nd) Therefore\, if we don’t take into account point (c) and still enlarge the currently defined RDS for LC\, it will probably not fit the whole portfolio; for the following reasons: \n\nFor the Large Corporate RDS\, member decided to exclude borrowers with an EAD less than 100.000 euros. Can this threshold be meaningful for the entire data set? Even for SME?\nMembers also decided to exclude borrowers with more than 10 loans\, expecting that this might cause overweighting. Is this applicable to Project Finance asset class for example?\n\ne) Creating a new RDS on the whole portfolio is a time-consuming exercise. Based on the previous experience of defining the LC RDS\, it took more than a year including validations. \n  \nPlease submit your vote (for or against the rescoping) by replying to this email (to olivier.plaetevoet@globalcreditdata.org ) before the special WG. If you wish to discuss it\, feel free to join the working group this Monday 15th July between 2pm and 2:30pm CET / 8am-8:30am EDT / 10pm-10:30pm AEST . \n \nAganda: \nhttps://www.globalcreditdata.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/wg_lgd_reference_model.ics
URL:https://globalcreditdata.org/events/special-working-group-lgd-reference-model-1572019/
CATEGORIES:WG LGD Reference Model
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR